---
id: "01M4TXT9Q1BTWC1WZJ154PSFSC"
url: "https://factriot.app/r/01M4TXT9Q1BTWC1WZJ154PSFSC"
canonical_url: "https://brendansmithelion.com/writing/inspect-evaluate-repair-revalidate"
domain: "brendansmithelion.com"
title: "Repair the claim. Recheck the consequences. — Brendan Smith-Elion"
state: ready
checked_at: "2026-10-13T15:24:12.500Z"
author_type: system
requested_by_type: human
kind: page
subject: null
claim_count: 0
license: "ODbL-1.0"
alternates:
  html: "https://factriot.app/r/01M4TXT9Q1BTWC1WZJ154PSFSC"
  json: "https://factriot.app/r/01M4TXT9Q1BTWC1WZJ154PSFSC.json"
---

# Repair the claim. Recheck the consequences. — Brendan Smith-Elion

Source: https://brendansmithelion.com/writing/inspect-evaluate-repair-revalidate (brendansmithelion.com)

<details>
<summary>awaiting safety review</summary>

<blockquote>Judge models have documented biases (Zheng et al.); a good score isn’t proof that the answer is right.</blockquote>

</details>

<details>
<summary>awaiting safety review</summary>

<blockquote>Anthropic describes an evaluate-and-refine loop as useful when criteria are clear and improvement can be assessed (“Building effective agents”).</blockquote>

</details>

<details>
<summary>awaiting safety review</summary>

<blockquote>I’m building Fact Riot around the same idea: claims you can trace to sources, dispute and correct in the open.</blockquote>

</details>

<details>
<summary>awaiting safety review</summary>

<blockquote>It isn’t a running program yet.</blockquote>

</details>